🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations produced results, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen talks with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult route since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the US president asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations resume.

The American leader last week said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of international law, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the assaults started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the final solution to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, stays intact. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the face of this assault."